1995 BMW Z3 vs. 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 1995 BMW Z3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1995 BMW Z3. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 BMW Z3 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW Z3. (179 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW Z3 | 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
Make | BMW | Maserati |
Model | Z3 | Bi Turbo |
Year Released | 1995 | 1986 |
Engine Size | 1894 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2510 mm |