1995 BMW Z3 vs. 1992 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1995 BMW Z3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1995 BMW Z3. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Villager weights approximately 625 kg more than 1995 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW Z3 | 1992 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | BMW | Mercury |
| Model | Z3 | Villager |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1894 cc | 2960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2860 mm |
