1995 BMW Z3 vs. 2001 Opel Omega
To start off, 2001 Opel Omega is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW Z3 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2001 Opel Omega. (101 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Opel Omega weights approximately 123 kg more than 1995 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Opel Omega (447 Nm) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW Z3. (179 Nm). This means 2001 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW Z3 | 2001 Opel Omega | |
Make | BMW | Opel |
Model | Z3 | Omega |
Year Released | 1995 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1894 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 447 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 99.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 91.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1298 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 60 L |