1995 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 558 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Bristol Blenheim (440 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (339 Nm). This means 1995 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Bristol Blenheim | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
| Model | Blenheim | Astro |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5896 cc | 4300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2790 mm |
