1995 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2000 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 2000 Dodge Avenger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 375 kg more than 2000 Dodge Avenger.
Because 1995 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Bristol Blenheim (440 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Avenger. (232 Nm). This means 1995 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Avenger.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Bristol Blenheim | 2000 Dodge Avenger | |
Make | Bristol | Dodge |
Model | Blenheim | Avenger |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5896 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 440 Nm | 232 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2640 mm |