1995 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2009 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2009 Ford Falcon is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Falcon (387 HP) has 159 more horse power than 1995 Bristol Blenheim. (228 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1995 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Falcon (520 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Bristol Blenheim. (440 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Bristol Blenheim.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Bristol Blenheim | 2009 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | Blenheim | Falcon |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5896 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 387 HP |
Torque | 440 Nm | 520 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2838 mm |