1995 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1995 Bristol Blenheim. (228 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1995 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Bristol Blenheim. (440 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Bristol Blenheim.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Bristol Blenheim | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Bristol | Jaguar |
Model | Blenheim | XF |
Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5896 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 440 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2908 mm |