1995 Bugatti EB 110 vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1995 Bugatti EB 110 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Bugatti EB 110 (553 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. (345 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Bugatti EB 110 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 270 kg more than 1995 Bugatti EB 110.
Because 1995 Bugatti EB 110 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Bugatti EB 110 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Bugatti EB 110 | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Bugatti | Ford |
| Model | EB 110 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3499 cc | 6964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 553 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 120 L | 40 L |
