1995 Bugatti EB 110 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Bugatti EB 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Bugatti EB 110 would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Bugatti EB 110 weights approximately 417 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1995 Bugatti EB 110 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Bugatti EB 110 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Bugatti EB 110 (611 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. (454 Nm). This means 1995 Bugatti EB 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Bugatti EB 110 | 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Bugatti | Chevrolet |
Model | EB 110 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3499 cc | 5670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 553 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 611 Nm | 454 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 1188 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2570 mm |