1995 Buick LeSabre vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 1995 Buick LeSabre is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Buick LeSabre (169 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 440 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Buick LeSabre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Buick LeSabre | 1962 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Buick | DKW |
| Model | LeSabre | Munga |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 169 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 68 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 31 L |
