1995 Buick Park Avenue vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick Park Avenue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick Park Avenue would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Buick Park Avenue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Buick Park Avenue (242 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Buick Park Avenue should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 259 kg more than 1995 Buick Park Avenue.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Buick Park Avenue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Buick Park Avenue (380 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 1995 Buick Park Avenue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Buick Park Avenue | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Buick | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Park Avenue | SSU |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1646 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 71 L |
