1995 Buick Regal vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1995 Buick Regal is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,842 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Buick Regal weights approximately 746 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Because 1963 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Buick Regal | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Buick | Lotus |
Model | Regal | Elan |
Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2842 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2140 mm |