1995 Buick Regal vs. 2001 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick Regal would be higher. At 2,842 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 105 kg more than 1995 Buick Regal.
Because 2001 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Buick Regal | 2001 Ford Econovan | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | Regal | Econovan |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2842 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2210 mm |
