1995 Buick Regal vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick Regal would be higher. At 2,842 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Buick Regal weights approximately 20 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Buick Regal | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Regal | 6 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2842 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2620 mm |