1995 Buick Regal vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick Regal would be higher. At 2,842 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Buick Regal weights approximately 310 kg more than 2003 Mazda Roadster.
Because 2003 Mazda Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mazda Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Buick Regal | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
| Make | Buick | Mazda |
| Model | Regal | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2842 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2270 mm |
