1995 Buick Regal vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick Regal would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XF weights approximately 482 kg more than 1995 Buick Regal.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Buick Regal | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Buick | Jaguar |
| Model | Regal | XF |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2842 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2908 mm |
