1995 Buick Regal vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick Regal would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 819 kg more than 1995 Buick Regal.
Because 2013 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Buick Regal. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Buick Regal | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | Regal | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2842 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 2159 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2790 mm |