1995 Buick Regal vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick Regal would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1041 kg more than 1995 Buick Regal.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Buick Regal. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Buick Regal | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | Regal | Tundra |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2842 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 306 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 2381 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5329 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1925 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3221 mm |