1995 Buick Roadmaster vs. 2000 Ford Econoline

To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick Roadmaster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick Roadmaster would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Buick Roadmaster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Buick Roadmaster (257 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Buick Roadmaster should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 255 kg more than 1995 Buick Roadmaster.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Buick Roadmaster (447 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1995 Buick Roadmaster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Econoline.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Buick Roadmaster 2000 Ford Econoline
Make Buick Ford
Model Roadmaster Econoline
Year Released 1995 2000
Body Type Station Wagon Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5733 cc 4195 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 257 HP 197 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 4700 RPM
Torque 447 Nm 338 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 2700 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 2070 kg 2325 kg
Vehicle Length 5540 mm 5390 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 2020 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 2060 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 3510 mm