1995 Buick XP2000 vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1995 Buick XP2000 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Buick XP2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Buick XP2000 weights approximately 722 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Buick XP2000 | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Buick | Reliant |
Model | XP2000 | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 798 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |