1995 Buick XP2000 vs. 1970 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1995 Buick XP2000 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Buick XP2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Buick XP2000 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1970 Triumph 1300.
Because 1995 Buick XP2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Buick XP2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Triumph 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Buick XP2000 | 1970 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Buick | Triumph |
Model | XP2000 | 1300 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 53 L |