1995 Buick XP2000 vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick XP2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick XP2000 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Buick XP2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Buick XP2000 weights approximately 312 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Because 1995 Buick XP2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Buick XP2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Buick XP2000 | 2000 Ford e-Ka | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | XP2000 | e-Ka |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1758 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Top Speed | 243 km/hour | 154 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2730 mm |