1995 Buick XP2000 vs. 2006 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick XP2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick XP2000 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Buick XP2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 262 kg more than 1995 Buick XP2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Buick XP2000 | 2006 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | XP2000 | STS |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 3563 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 253 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 243 km/hour | 229 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1782 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 66 L |
