1995 Buick XP2000 vs. 2010 Audi A6
To start off, 2010 Audi A6 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick XP2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick XP2000 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Buick XP2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi A6 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1995 Buick XP2000.
Because 2010 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Buick XP2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Buick XP2000 | 2010 Audi A6 | |
Make | Buick | Audi |
Model | XP2000 | A6 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 350 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2842 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |