1995 Buick XP2000 vs. 2010 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2010 Ford Taurus is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick XP2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick XP2000 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Buick XP2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Taurus weights approximately 301 kg more than 1995 Buick XP2000.
Because 1995 Buick XP2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Buick XP2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Buick XP2000 | 2010 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | XP2000 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 263 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1821 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 5154 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2868 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 72 L |