1995 Buick XP2000 vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick XP2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick XP2000 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Buick XP2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Buick XP2000 weights approximately 565 kg more than 2010 Mazda BT-50.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Buick XP2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Buick XP2000 has automatic transmission and 2010 Mazda BT-50 has manual transmission. 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Buick XP2000 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Buick XP2000 | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | XP2000 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |