1995 Buick XP2000 vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick XP2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick XP2000 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 260 kg more than 1995 Buick XP2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Buick XP2000 | 2010 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | XP2000 | C |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 451 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4727 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1796 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2761 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 66 L |
