1995 Buick XP2000 vs. 2010 Zenvo ST1
To start off, 2010 Zenvo ST1 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick XP2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick XP2000 would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Zenvo ST1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Buick XP2000 weights approximately 144 kg more than 2010 Zenvo ST1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Buick XP2000 has automatic transmission and 2010 Zenvo ST1 has manual transmission. 2010 Zenvo ST1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Buick XP2000 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Buick XP2000 | 2010 Zenvo ST1 | |
| Make | Buick | Zenvo |
| Model | XP2000 | ST1 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 1104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 243 km/hour | 375 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1376 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4665 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2041 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1198 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3055 mm |
