1995 Buick XP2000 vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick XP2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick XP2000 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Buick XP2000 weights approximately 69 kg more than 2011 Volvo C30.
Because 1995 Buick XP2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Buick XP2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Buick XP2000 has automatic transmission and 2011 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2011 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Buick XP2000 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Buick XP2000 | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | XP2000 | C30 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |