1995 Buick XP2000 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick XP2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick XP2000 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Buick XP2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 185 kg more than 1995 Buick XP2000.
Because 1995 Buick XP2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Buick XP2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Buick XP2000 | 2012 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | XP2000 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2858 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 71 L |