1995 Buick XP2000 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick XP2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick XP2000 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Buick XP2000 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Buick XP2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Buick XP2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Buick XP2000 | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | XP2000 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 169 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 61 L |