1995 Buick XP2000 vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick XP2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick XP2000 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Buick XP2000 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Buick XP2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Buick XP2000 | 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | XP2000 | ML |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 201 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 243 km/hour | 209 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4803 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2141 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1796 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2916 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 93 L |
