1995 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1963 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1995 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 435 kg more than 1963 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Cadillac DeVille | 1963 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | Zodiac |
Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1770 mm |