1995 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 1995 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1125 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Cadillac DeVille | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
| Model | DeVille | Elite |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1216 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1480 mm |
