1995 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 1995 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 403 kg more than 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Cadillac DeVille | 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | DeVille | SL |
Year Released | 1995 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2306 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1302 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1770 mm |