1995 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1966 Skoda 1202
To start off, 1995 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1966 Skoda 1202. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1966 Skoda 1202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 600 kg more than 1966 Skoda 1202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Cadillac DeVille | 1966 Skoda 1202 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
| Model | DeVille | 1202 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4599 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1710 mm |
