1995 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1968 Mazda R-100
To start off, 1995 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1968 Mazda R-100. (110 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda R-100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 900 kg more than 1968 Mazda R-100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Cadillac DeVille | 1968 Mazda R-100 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | R-100 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4599 cc | 1963 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1490 mm |
