1995 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1968 Skoda 1202
To start off, 1995 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1968 Skoda 1202. (45 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1968 Skoda 1202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 600 kg more than 1968 Skoda 1202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Skoda 1202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Skoda 1202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Cadillac DeVille | 1968 Skoda 1202 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
| Model | DeVille | 1202 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1174 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1710 mm |
