1995 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1995 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (301 HP) has 231 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 840 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Cadillac DeVille | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | DeVille | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1630 mm |