1995 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1983 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1995 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 645 kg more than 1983 Mazda RX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Cadillac DeVille | 1983 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4599 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1680 mm |
