1995 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1995 Cadillac DeVille. (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1995 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 40 kg more than 1995 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | DeVille | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4599 cc | 5666 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1800 mm |
