1995 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. (194 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 70 kg more than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | DeVille | X-Type |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1800 mm |