1995 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 975 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Cadillac | MCC |
| Model | DeVille | Smart |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1630 mm |
