1995 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (305 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1995 Cadillac DeVille. (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1995 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 131 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Cadillac DeVille | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | DeVille | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1574 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1860 mm |
