1995 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2005 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1995 Cadillac DeVille. (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1995 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 7 kg more than 1995 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Cadillac DeVille | 2005 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | DeVille | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3932 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 280 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1712 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1840 mm |
