1995 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. Both 1995 Cadillac DeVille and 2010 Ford Mustang are equipped with a 4,600 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Mustang (315 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1995 Cadillac DeVille. (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1995 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 102 kg more than 2010 Ford Mustang.
Because 2010 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | Mustang |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 315 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1603 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1877 mm |