1995 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2013 Volvo X670. (237 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo X670. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo X670 weights approximately 167 kg more than 1995 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 1995 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Cadillac DeVille | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | DeVille | X670 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1872 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1870 mm |