1995 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1963 Morgan 4
To start off, 1995 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 4,564 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac Eldorado (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1963 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1105 kg more than 1963 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Cadillac Eldorado | 1963 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Morgan |
| Model | Eldorado | 4 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4564 cc | 1340 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 55 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2450 mm |
