1995 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1966 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1995 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac Eldorado (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 350 kg more than 1995 Cadillac Eldorado.
Because 1966 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Cadillac Eldorado | 1966 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | Eldorado | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4564 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 82 L |
