1995 Caterham 21 vs. 2003 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2003 GMC Sierra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Caterham 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Caterham 21 would be higher. At 4,816 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 GMC Sierra (275 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1995 Caterham 21. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1995 Caterham 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1297 kg more than 1995 Caterham 21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 GMC Sierra (386 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Caterham 21. (156 Nm). This means 2003 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Caterham 21.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Caterham 21 | 2003 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Caterham | GMC |
Model | 21 | Sierra |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 4816 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 275 HP |
Torque | 156 Nm | 386 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 648 kg | 1945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1070 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3380 mm |